HEADLINES

Court upholds decision: Bukit Cherakah degazettement challenge denied

Judge says application for review 'out of time', as decision to degazette was made on Nov 20, 2000

11:50 AM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – The Court of Appeal has upheld the high court decision to deny leave for a judicial review to challenge the Selangor government’s degazettement of Bukit Cherakah as a forest reserve.

In delivering the court’s decision, judge Datuk Azizah Nawawi said the application to review the degazettement decision made in 2000 “is clearly out of time and this goes to the issue of jurisdiction”.

The Selangor exco decision to degazette was made on November 20, 2000.

She said the review application should be filed promptly and within three months from the date when the grounds of the application first arose or when the decision was first told to the appellants.

“Even if the appellants have no knowledge of the impugn decision made in year 2000, the grounds of the application would have arisen when parts of the said lands were alienated to the other parties between 2001 and 2016, respectively. 

“Thereafter, the said parties have developed the said land into housing estates, including Taman Budiman and the Universiti Teknologi Mara, UiTM (Kampus Puncak Perdana).”

The two other judges were Datuk Azimah Omar and Datuk Wong Kian Kheong.

The appeal against the high court decision on November 17 was filed on May 5 by Shah Alam Community Forest Society and Pertubuhan Pelindung Khazanah Alam Malaysia, the assistant state legal adviser Khairul Nizam Abu Bakar appearing for the Selangor government, the state executive council, the state Forestry Department director, and the Petaling Land and Mines Department, as well as the counsels for two companies and the state Development Corporation (PKNS).

The two NGOs claimed that it was illegal for the Selangor government to backdate a gazette, notifying that a decision had been made on the degazettement on November 20, 2000.

They had named the Selangor government, the state executive council, the state Forestry Department director, the Petaling Land and Mines Department, YCH Development Sdn Bhd, PKNS, and Restu Mantap Sdn Bhd as respondents in the judicial review. – January 24, 2024

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

China break up Olympic champions to groom future stars

Olympic gold medallist Jia Yi Fan now partners Zhang Shu Xian in a bold move to mentor rising talent, as China strengthen their grip on women’s doubles badminton

Cleared for layoffs? AirAsia to retrench 20% of workforce in major cost-cutting move

This allegedly involves cabin services, cargo and logistics, engineering and maintenance, as well as the commercial division, according to Scoop’s source

Related