HEADLINES

Federal Court grants appeal for full hearing of Segamat election petition

Three-member bench orders Barisan Nasional’s M. Ramasamy’s petition to be heard before another judge

6:26 PM MYT

 

PUTRAJAYA – The Federal Court today allowed Barisan Nasional (BN) candidate Tan Sri M. Ramasamy’s appeal to send back his Segamat election petition to the election court for a full hearing. 

A three-member bench comprising justices Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof, Datuk Seri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim, and Datuk Mary Lim Thiam Suan ordered the petition to be heard before another judge.

The court set aside this April 3 decision of the election court, which struck out Ramasamy’s election petition after accepting a preliminary objection raised by respondents.

The respondents named in the petition are Segamat MP R. Yuneswaran, the returning officer, and the Election Commission.

In the court’s decision, justice Zabariah remitted the petition back to the election court to hear issues pertaining to whether the campaign materials violated the election laws and bribery allegations.

The Federal Court judge (justice Zabariah) then fixed August 24 for mention of the case at the election court.

Yuneswaran, a Pakatan Harapan candidate, won the seat with a majority of 5,669 votes in the 15th general election held last year and was declared the elected member of parliament for the constituency.

He defeated Ramasamy, Perikatan Nasional’s P. Poobalan, and Pejuang’s Syed Hairoul Faizey. Ramasamy, who is MIC treasurer, stood as a candidate for BN in that parliamentary constituency.

Ramasamy subsequently filed the election petition, seeking, among other things, a declaration that the parliamentary election for the Segamat constituency was void and a declaration that Yuneswaran was not duly elected as a member of Parliament.

The election court judge Mohd Radzi Abdul Hamid had dismissed Ramasamy’s election petition after accepting the preliminary objection raised by the respondents, among others, including that Ramasamy failed to comply with Rule 15(4) of the Election Petition Rules 1954, pertaining to the particulars of his (Ramasamy’s) affidavit of service and his failure to comply with the election petition rules regarding the facts pleaded in his petition, which were incapable of sustaining the declarations sought.

Ramasamy was represented by lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, while lawyer Lau Yi Leong represented Yuneswaran, and senior federal counsel Suzana Atan appeared for the returning officer and the Election Commission. – August 18, 2023

Topics

 

Popular

Petronas staff to be shown the door to make up losses from Petros deal?

Source claims national O&G firm is expected to see 30% revenue loss once agreed formula for natural gas distribution in Sarawak is implemented

Moving an international airport – Kamil Abu Bakar

On the 27th anniversary of the international airport's move from Subang to Sepang, the man overseeing the migration looks back on the gargantuan task

‘Robbed again’: Johor Orang Asli accuse trustees of misusing RM6mil from land compensation fund

Linggiu Valley community files MACC report, claiming decades-old RM38.5mil trust meant for their families has been abused repeatedly

Related